July 28, 2012
"Watching it made me proud to be a Lancastrian. Danny Boyle is from just down the road to me and so much of my life was in this, everything I believe in, the history from the industrial revolution right through to the NHS."

— Wayne Hemmingway, about the opening ceremony. Good. Were there Yorkists? Succession fights? Red and White roses? Proud to be a Lancastrian, havn’t heard that since the 15th Century. Get with the ap Twdrs bro. And, note, he olny believes in History from the Industrial Revolution-NHS. So like 200ish years. Even America is older than that bro. 

(Source: huffingtonpost.co.uk)

January 30, 2012
The Wars of the Roses, by Trevor Royle
Just stop it. If you are a serious medievalist and judging my choice of histories, just stop it. I needed a readable, concise overview of what the hell happened in England from the death of Edward III to the coronation of Henry Tudor (aka Henry VII). I did not need deep nuance or subtlety, just the basic who killed who and vaguely why and Royle fit the bill. Moreover, I thought he did a great job expressing the gist of a series of conflicts that are rather obtuse to the modern mind. Even the names are hard. One must carefully keep track of when a person goes from being a man to a place. The various members of the Percy family can be ‘Percy’ or ‘Northumberland,’ same with York, Lancaster, etc. Royle’s helpful index at the back is useful and he does a good job making clear just who is who. Really, the picture one takes away is of a drastically small circle. Everyone marries everyone, and really this is a family squabble that consumes a nation. It’s funny, though, who we remember. Poor old John of Gaunt. I think he’d have been a splendid king. Anyhow, for anyone who wants to brush up on this period, or just read a decent historical narrative, Royle’s Wars of the Roses fits the bill nicely. 

The Wars of the Roses, by Trevor Royle

Just stop it. If you are a serious medievalist and judging my choice of histories, just stop it. I needed a readable, concise overview of what the hell happened in England from the death of Edward III to the coronation of Henry Tudor (aka Henry VII). I did not need deep nuance or subtlety, just the basic who killed who and vaguely why and Royle fit the bill. Moreover, I thought he did a great job expressing the gist of a series of conflicts that are rather obtuse to the modern mind. Even the names are hard. One must carefully keep track of when a person goes from being a man to a place. The various members of the Percy family can be ‘Percy’ or ‘Northumberland,’ same with York, Lancaster, etc. Royle’s helpful index at the back is useful and he does a good job making clear just who is who. Really, the picture one takes away is of a drastically small circle. Everyone marries everyone, and really this is a family squabble that consumes a nation. It’s funny, though, who we remember. Poor old John of Gaunt. I think he’d have been a splendid king. Anyhow, for anyone who wants to brush up on this period, or just read a decent historical narrative, Royle’s Wars of the Roses fits the bill nicely. 

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »