October 28, 2012
Burnable Books

Hi Friends,

Just thought some of you might be interested in this. This one of my professor’s blogs. He teaches medieval lit here at UVA, but blogs about intersections of literature, academics, and culture. More long form essays than little tumblr blurbs. Lots of thought provoking election year stuff at the moment. Y’all should check it out. 

Here is the ‘follow on Tumblr’ link 

Zach

October 16, 2012
Two of the best covers ever. Modernists just don’t get stuff this good. More reasons to stick with pre-1800 stuff and avoid all that Post-Interesting stuff. (Taken with Instagram)

Two of the best covers ever. Modernists just don’t get stuff this good. More reasons to stick with pre-1800 stuff and avoid all that Post-Interesting stuff. (Taken with Instagram)

October 10, 2012
A good morning at Alderman (Taken with Instagram)

A good morning at Alderman (Taken with Instagram)

October 4, 2012
I love working with such cool people. The best thing about being a medievalist is getting to roll- getting medieval- with other medievalists. We make virtue of necessity and transgress all disciplinary bounds and generally have a lot of fun together and occasionally someone (never me) comes up with something brilliant. One of my biggest goals in the great grad school hunt was finding a place with a vibrant medieval community and UVA has one for sure. Life’s crazy thus the paucity of posts, but the people are good. 

I love working with such cool people. The best thing about being a medievalist is getting to roll- getting medieval- with other medievalists. We make virtue of necessity and transgress all disciplinary bounds and generally have a lot of fun together and occasionally someone (never me) comes up with something brilliant. One of my biggest goals in the great grad school hunt was finding a place with a vibrant medieval community and UVA has one for sure. Life’s crazy thus the paucity of posts, but the people are good. 

August 26, 2012
Fredson Bowers essentially founded the UVA English Dept. As part of our orientation I was part of a group who gave a talk on Bowers scholarship and role in the dept. Below is my section as pertains to why I am at UVA. Thought it might be interesting to like 3 people. 
Fredson Bowers’ legacy continues today. Were it not for Bowers I doubt I would be here. Bowers’ legacy lies not so much in his publications per se but in the discourse he initiated, specifically at UVA. Prior to Bowers’ Principles of Bibliographic Description the study of bibliography existed as the handmaiden of literature. Bower’s choice to privilege the physical book as an object as worthy of study, as more than simply a container for an author’s text, rubbed some the wrong way.  Moreover his conception of bibliography as a rigorous discursive field of categories and terms felt too ‘scientific’ for many literary scholars. Perhaps Bowers was a decade early. By the late 50s and early 60s Theory with a capital T oozed out of Paris and into every niche of the academy, Theory deeply concerned with structures and achieves, Theory that was pervasively conditioned, as our own Bruce Holsinger has shown, by a medievalism rooted in bibliography. And yet, simple recapitulating his influence in the field of bibliography fails to do Bowers justice. Had Bowers formidable intellect been any less accommodating to divergent views, had he been any less stringent in his responses to those same critics, Bowers legacy would be akin to any number of other great critics. Bowers did run from his critics. He invited them into his home: his campus and his journal. Today that is his greatest gift to us. He both initiated a defining discourse and insured that the critical conversations took place here. He embedded bibliography into the fabric of the university by ensuring UVA became a place where critics of all stripes could and would flourish. To close briefly: I remember the feeling the first time I ‘got’ a book in the Bowers-ian sense. It changed the course of my life. It happened under the tutelage of Ralph Hanna, himself deeply influenced by Fredson Bowers and then three years later when it came time to make my PhD decision Ralph was the one urging me towards UVA because, he said, they will respect what you do. For me, for all of us, Bowers’ legacy is the chance to continue his conversation in his house, under his house rules. The rules are simple: Be excellent. Be interesting. Don’t hide.  We hope that we live up to his standards, sartorial included. 

Fredson Bowers essentially founded the UVA English Dept. As part of our orientation I was part of a group who gave a talk on Bowers scholarship and role in the dept. Below is my section as pertains to why I am at UVA. Thought it might be interesting to like 3 people. 

Fredson Bowers’ legacy continues today. Were it not for Bowers I doubt I would be here. Bowers’ legacy lies not so much in his publications per se but in the discourse he initiated, specifically at UVA. Prior to Bowers’ Principles of Bibliographic Description the study of bibliography existed as the handmaiden of literature. Bower’s choice to privilege the physical book as an object as worthy of study, as more than simply a container for an author’s text, rubbed some the wrong way.  Moreover his conception of bibliography as a rigorous discursive field of categories and terms felt too ‘scientific’ for many literary scholars. Perhaps Bowers was a decade early. By the late 50s and early 60s Theory with a capital T oozed out of Paris and into every niche of the academy, Theory deeply concerned with structures and achieves, Theory that was pervasively conditioned, as our own Bruce Holsinger has shown, by a medievalism rooted in bibliography. And yet, simple recapitulating his influence in the field of bibliography fails to do Bowers justice. Had Bowers formidable intellect been any less accommodating to divergent views, had he been any less stringent in his responses to those same critics, Bowers legacy would be akin to any number of other great critics. Bowers did run from his critics. He invited them into his home: his campus and his journal. Today that is his greatest gift to us. He both initiated a defining discourse and insured that the critical conversations took place here. He embedded bibliography into the fabric of the university by ensuring UVA became a place where critics of all stripes could and would flourish. To close briefly: I remember the feeling the first time I ‘got’ a book in the Bowers-ian sense. It changed the course of my life. It happened under the tutelage of Ralph Hanna, himself deeply influenced by Fredson Bowers and then three years later when it came time to make my PhD decision Ralph was the one urging me towards UVA because, he said, they will respect what you do. For me, for all of us, Bowers’ legacy is the chance to continue his conversation in his house, under his house rules. The rules are simple: Be excellent. Be interesting. Don’t hide.  We hope that we live up to his standards, sartorial included. 

August 15, 2012
A Lover’s Discourse

It is a generally known fact that I am rather unromantic about my PhD/being a career academic. The reasons for this are rational, true, and- I think- healthy.[1] Yet this is not the whole story.  Last week, my first week in Charlottesville, I took a run up to campus. When I run I listen to music.[2] That evening, as I ran up The Lawn and the steps of the Rotunda- ‘Encore’- blazing in my ears, I realized several things in succession or all at once. Memory is a bitch like that; it’s hard to figure out how and why things cohere. I realized how blessed I am that at each step my education- BA, MPhil, and now PhD- I have lived and worked in truly inspiring places. Each campus has its own unique charm but they are all the same in that their specific geographies militate in favor of productive reflection. Asbury is the quintessential liberal arts college and an All American small town, Oxford is iconic in the strongest terms, and UVA is perhaps the cradle of American public education.

Read More

July 16, 2012
Oxford, Money, and Value

What exactly do you mean when you say, “Oxford was no longer worth the money”? Do you think that it isn’t worth doing a PhD in Medieval Studies at Oxford? I’m asking because I’ve been planning on applying for it.

Answering here b/c I get more formatting options…

Good question. Its actually several questions. A few points.

Also, NB, these are just my opinions based on my specific circumstances, some are addressed below, some I will not address ever on tumblr. It is no way a criticism of the Oxford DPhil model in principle but rather a discussion of a choice between two excellent options based on what I wanted for my life at a specific, individual, moment. 

1. Oxford is a DPhil, not a PhD. I am not being pedantic. This is a difference. 

2. Medieval Studies or English Literature 650-1550 or Medieval History. This determines your departmental housing, which is crucial. I was Eng. Lit. 

3. Money question: ‘worth it.’ I will presuppose that you are not independently wealthy and will in fact need/want an academic job to pay bills. 

So our first question: do you want to work in the US or in the UK? A Dphil is a research degree. You come over, you do your thesis, you graduate. A PhD is both a research degree and a professional internship of a sort.

Read More

July 13, 2012
CV


In response to questions like: what did you, what did you study, etc. my CV is below

Read More

June 25, 2012
Why Women Still Can't Have It All

By Anne-Marie Slaughter

Read this on the plane today. One of the best articles I have read in a long time- for men and women. And, ladies, a great ad for marrying an academic if you have major career ambitions. That last bit was admittedly self-serving. The article is excellent. More analysis than solutions, but says many things that all people need to hear and that will catch major flack from polemicists left and right. Even the sections I vaugly disagree- likely on account of youth- with, I deeply admire the courage to start the conversation. 

May 26, 2012
Advice to would be scholars

Frequently I am asked what the academic life is like. First, I have no idea what this is or when it starts. For me I would say it really started in a basement hallway of Reasoner Hall at Asbury College when I skipped a class to talk to a prof about Beowulf. As to the nature of this life, all jokes aside, it is a good life for those who can live it. Anyhow, I have been unreasonably blessed with good friends and mentors in my field. Below is a bit of advice from one of my best friends. Will keep his identity covert save to say he has made his own way, now occupies a major continental chair, and previously held prestigious posts at Princeton, Oxford, and in London. He is also an even better person than scholar. 

Read More

April 29, 2012

3nater-deactivated20120518 asked: The envy I feel toward your life is immense. Exactly how rough is the world of academia?

I am currently 26 (older than 99% of the people on tumblr), with a Masters from Oxford and living at home with my parents in Kentucky working at a bakery to make ends meet. It’s that rough :-). That said, preasent status is actually part of a plan of accepting somewhat less than optimal/embarassing situations now so as to be in the best position to start my PhD in the fall. The world of academia is like any other world. It has its ups and downs, its pro’s and con’s. The envy I feel towards my peers who have stable jobs, relationships, houses, etc. is as substantial as any they feel towards my seemingly (via the Facebook, Tumblr, etc. ) fun, exciting academic life. Much like any career, one’s ability to survive and thrive in the academic world boils down to three things: talent, luck, and perseverance. I would say my world is no more or less rough than anyone else’s: it’s simply mine. I would say it’s made substantially less rough by the conscious choices to rejoice with others when they find sucess in any endeavor and to refuse to indulge in any sort of self congratulatory self loathing and or escapist fantasies. All life paths are rough because, fundamentally they all involve living, which is known to be fatal and- even worse- requires significant engagement with human beaings. The Horror! The Horror! Living with people historically makes things rough.  While that seems rather fatalistic and bleak its actually rather re-assuring. Life is just life for everyone. The problem with Tumblr, IMO, is that it induces us to envy others, to collect parts of their lives via-re blogging- as away of expressing our own dissatisfaction with our own lives. As Rilke says: the point is to live the questions now. 

Note, this answer meant to be sincere and not mocking, pedantic, aloof or rude. Interwebs distort tone.

2:13pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZmxX6yKY0B7t
  
Filed under: gradschool grad school 
April 20, 2012
Faculty Salary....

Data is, of course, open to interpretation and specific salaries vary radically by field. And, for example, a handful of superstars pulling down a million or two a year (not impossible for say, the dean of an Ivy League Law School or maybe a hot shot scientist who will bring in tons of gov’t research grants) would wash out a lot of 50k English lit salaries but still blow up the average. Also, many of the top salaries are crushed by cost of living/high local taxes, and the drop off after Public/Rich universities is scary. 

February 8, 2012

I will not be indigent next year. I got my first grad acceptance (to a school in the SE US) with a VERY enticing funding package. Things are starting to shake out. When all the dust settles and I have signed on a dotted line I promise to make a series of posts about the trials and travails of the whole process of getting in/funded. Given the amount of times I have been googled by potential employers/Grad Schools, I am loath to put too much up at the moment. 

October 26, 2011
Vade Mecum: A GRE for Literature in English Study Guide

For those studying for the GRE Subject exam in English Literature, this is an amazing resource. 

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »